ValuentumAd

Official PayPal Seal

You are here: Home » » Why Some Investors Fail

Why Some Investors Fail

publication date: Jun 1, 2017
 | 
author/source: Brian Nelson, CFA

Image Source: crabchick

Intrinsic value represents the conclusion to any and all stock research: What is the company worth? DCF valuation captures the expectations of a firm’s competitive advantages, growth prospects, strategic endeavors, and any other qualitative factor. No other process does this. Putting to numbers a plethora of advanced fundamental items in arriving at a fair value estimate is the cornerstone--and the most critical component--of any stock research analysis. Without an in-depth intrinsic-value assessment, research is but a story that has no ending.

    -- Brian Nelson, President, Valuentum Securities, 2011 slide deck

By Brian Nelson, CFA

A lot of investors may not apply valuation techniques in earnest.

Some may say a stock is trading at 10 times EBITDA or that it’s trading at 10 times earnings, but some may really not know whether those quoted measures are good or bad -- for example, 10 times EBITDA can be good for a company truly worth 20 times EBITDA and bad for a company worth 5 times EBITDA. And what about those earnings numbers? Are they non-GAAP? Are they the forward 12-month projection, or are they trailing numbers? And what if the company truly is fairly valued at 10 times earnings because it has a mountain of net debt on the balance sheet and growth prospects are grim?

Because of these questions and more, our team rigorously calculates the intrinsic value of every firm in our coverage universe through the lens of a discounted cash-flow (DCF) model. The DCF framework is the only one that applies intensively and exclusively to each specific company that one is trying to value. That, itself, is invaluable and makes the DCF a much better approach than other valuation exercises including relative assessments. We provide fair value estimates and fair value ranges for the vast number of companies in our coverage universe. They can be found here or at the top of each company's 16-page report.

But Why Do We Do This?

Let’s answer the question of why we focus so much on valuation by starting with a simple example.

You have four buckets: the first is filled with $100 worth of ice, the second is filled with $100 worth of worms, the third is filled with $100 worth of shampoo, and the fourth is filled with $100 worth of water. Which one is worth more, assuming each bucket is identical?

I have to say that a large percentage of investors would say that each bucket is worth the same. This isn’t a trick question. We’re hoping you’d say they are worth the same.

No matter how cold the ice is, or how good the worms can be used to catch fish, or how refreshing the shampoo is, or how thirst-quenching the water might be, the buckets still are worth the same. We’ve already determined the value of these buckets based on their respective intrinsic qualities ($100), and no matter how well one talks up the attributes of each, the value is not going to change.

But what does this example have to do with investing? Well, when it comes to investing, the ability sometimes to reason through comparisons like this, and the application of common sense to answer obvious questions like this often breaks down.

Why? Because investors start focusing and talking about the composition of a company’s value, instead of focusing on the firm’s value itself. Think of value as what something is worth because of its qualities (future free cash flows), not in addition to its qualities. Value isn't an investment consideration -- it often is THE investment consideration.

Let’s now try this example for illustration.

You have four companies. One continues to exceed earnings estimates, but its discounted future free cash flows suggest it is worth $70. Warren Buffett classifies the second company as having an ultra-wide economic moat, but its discounted future free cash flows suggest it is worth $70. The third company has an awesome chart, but its discounted free cash flows suggest it is worth $70. And the fourth company pays a hefty dividend, but its shares, too, are worth $70 each.

Which company is more valuable?

One might start hearing comments from "talking heads on TV" that the company that exceeds earnings estimates is the better idea, or you’ll hear others say that Warren Buffett’s economic moat makes the second pick better. There will be a third group that says the chart is all that matters, and the fourth group might not even consider the first three companies because those companies don’t pay a dividend!

Can you start to see how investors get confused this day and age? The whole ability to compare stocks somehow breaks down when they starting talking about them. 

No matter how wide Warren Buffett thinks a company’s economic moat may be or how frequently the company has beaten earnings estimates or how fancy the chart looks or how high the dividend payment is, each company in the above example is still worth $70. The composition of the value is not a reason to own a company. The value of a company is THE reason to own it.

Getting A Bargain For Shares

Any day of the week, I will gladly pay less than the present value of a company’s future free cash flows for that company (the bigger the discount the better). Notice how I didn’t say anything with respect to earnings estimates, valuation multiples, or Warren Buffett’s economic moat.

After all, how can you pay less than the value of ‘exceeding earnings estimates’ or less than the value of an ‘economic moat?’ How do you determine the value based on a chart? Market news sometimes just doesn’t make any sense. Earnings, competitive advantages, etc. are just factors that roll up to calculate the intrinsic value of a company.

The value of a company is not a consideration to own a company; it is THE consideration. It embodies a company’s expected growth rate, its competitive prowess, and every other intrinsic factor. So the next time you read about a discounted cash-flow valuation analysis, it is not a robotic output or just some financial metrics, it represents and embeds the conclusion to any and all fundamental analysis. It is not missing something. It is the answer, the conclusion, the result of any and all research.

It's Okay to Debate Components of Value!

Now that said, of course it’s fine to talk about the qualities of ice, worms, shampoo and water (as in the above example), but at the end of the day, the only thing that matters is what something is worth (what does it weigh). Legendary investor Benjamin Graham was well-known for calling the market a weighing machine in the long run, and to a large extent, the value (the weight) of a firm is what he was referring to in this particular instance.

If Benjamin Graham or Warren Buffett could buy a no-moat stock for pennies on the $1, they’d do it. After all, Buffett did do it with US Airways (LCC), arguably a no-moat equity. Do most investors that follow earnings estimates actually think the best companies of all time always beat estimates every quarter? They must know that there was something else supporting the stock -- that is, its valuation. For the pure technicians, what happens when a chart rolls over? Is the company then doomed forever? Absolutely not. We love combining valuation and technical/momentum indicators in the stock-selection process, the Valuentum Buying Index, but intrinsic value estimation is the first component of the index.

Understanding business models is also very important. After all, it has helped save many Valuentum readers a ton of money on our call on American Capital Agency (AGNC) and other highly-leveraged mREITs both at the top in September 2012 (here) and right before the subsequent collapse (here). We also can't forget about the risky business models and the collapse in shares of Kinder Morgan (KMI), Stonemor (STON), SeaDrill (SDRL), and so many others--but valuation is so powerful!

Just look at our inaugural Best Ideas portfolio in July 2011 here. Our longs were Apple (AAPL), Altria (MO), Ancestry.com (which was bought out), Astronics (ATRO), Buffalo Wild Wings (BWLD), Collective Brands (which was bought out), EDAC Tech (which was bought out), Precision Castparts (which was bought out), and Republic Services (RSG). The July 2011 edition that had our Best Ideas portfolio documented within it was certainly a valuable edition!

When you read our research, we’re not just providing financial metrics -- Valuentum is striving to provide an answer to the most important question in investing: what is a company worth? Though there are varying opinions about which underlying factor is the most important investment consideration, at the end of the day, valuation tops all other. Investors that don't pay attention to valuation are doomed to fail...eventually. 

A previous version of this article appeared on Valuentum's website August 2013.


--------------------------------------------------
The Best Ideas Newsletter, Dividend Growth Newsletter, Nelson Exclusive publication, and any reports and content found on this website are for information purposes only and should not be considered a solicitation to buy or sell any security. Valuentum is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for results obtained from the use of its newsletters, reports, commentary, or publications and accepts no liability for how readers may choose to utilize the content. Valuentum is not a money manager, is not a registered investment advisor, and does not offer brokerage or investment banking services. The sources of the data used on this website and reports are believed by Valuentum to be reliable, but the data’s accuracy, completeness or interpretation cannot be guaranteed. Valuentum, its employees, independent contractors and affiliates may have long, short or derivative positions in the securities mentioned on this website. The Best Ideas Newsletter portfolio and Dividend Growth Newsletter portfolio are not real money portfolios. Performance, including that in the Nelson Exclusive publication, is hypothetical and does not represent actual trading. Actual results may differ from simulated information, results, or performance being presented. For more information about Valuentum and the products and services it offers, please contact us at info@valuentum.com.